T+1 SETTLEMENT CYCLE - ECONOMY

News: Explained | How will the T+1 settlement cycle impact markets?

 

What's in the news?

       On January 27, stock markets in India concluded its transition to the T+1 settlement regime.

       It has become the second largest market after China to have made the transition ahead of the U.S., Europe and Japan which adhere to the T+2 settlement cycle.

 

Key takeaways:

       The phased transition had begun on February 25 last year following markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)’s circular in September 2021.

 

T+1 Settlement Cycle:

       The T+1 settlement cycle means that trade-related settlements must be done within a day, or 24 hours, of the completion of a transaction.

       For example, under T+1, if a customer bought shares on Wednesday, they would be credited to the customer’s demat account on Thursday.

       This is different from T+2, where they will be settled on Friday.

       As many as 256 large-cap and top mid-cap stocks, including Nifty and Sensex stocks, will come under the T+1 settlement in Indian Stock Exchange.

 

Significance:

       In the T+1 format, if an investor sells a share and will get the money within a day, and the buyer will get the shares in his/her demat account also within a day.

       The shorter trade settlement cycle is useful for the Indian equity markets from a liquidity perspective.

       It will help investors in reducing the overall capital requirements with the margins getting released on T+1 day, and in getting the funds in the bank account within 24 hours of the sale of shares.

       The shift will boost operational efficiency as the rolling of funds and stocks will be faster.

 

Safer Markets:

       T+1 settlement cycle not only reduces the timeframe but also reduces and frees up capital required to collateralize that risk, thereby reducing systemic risks.

       A shortened settlement cycle also reduces the number of outstanding unsettled trades at any point of time, and thus decreases the unsettled exposure to Clearing Corporation by 50 per cent.

       The narrower the settlement cycle, the narrower the time window for a counterparty insolvency/bankruptcy to impact the settlement of a trade.

 

Opposition from foreign investors:

       Foreign investors were against SEBI’s T+1 proposal, and had written to the regulator and the Finance Ministry about the operational issues faced by them, as they operate from different geographies.

       Among the issues raised by them were time zone differences, information flow processes, and foreign exchange problems.

       Foreign investors said they would also find it difficult to hedge their net India exposure in dollar terms at the end of the day under the T+1 system.