Supreme Court's
Recall of Benami Law Verdict – polity
NEWS: The Supreme Court
recalled its August 2022 judgment on October 18, 2023, reviving 4,800 benami
transaction cases.
·
These cases involve properties worth
₹12,000 crore across India, previously put on hold by the Income Tax (I-T)
Department.
WHAT’S IN THE NEWS?
Historical Context of the Law
·
The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act
was originally enacted in 1988.
·
However, it remained dormant due to the
absence of an implementation framework.
·
The 2016 Amendment introduced stringent
measures, including imprisonment and fines for benami transactions dating back
to 1988.
Supreme Court’s 2022 Verdict
·
Declared the retrospective application of
the 2016 Amendment unconstitutional.
·
Stopped the I-T Department from pursuing
cases related to pre-2016 transactions.
·
Halted criminal prosecution and
confiscation for these transactions.
Impact of the October 2023 Recall Verdict
·
Allows the I-T Department to resume
investigations and proceedings.
·
Revival of legal proceedings underlines
the importance of pending Supreme Court judgments for final direction.
Current Benami Probes
·
3,850 cases under probe involving benami
assets worth ₹8,000 crore.
·
Cases relate to post-2016 transactions,
unaffected by the 2022 Supreme Court ruling.
·
Difficulties in tracking entities involved
in benami transactions due to liquidation, dissolution, or removal from
corporate registries.
·
Time-lapse of over eight years complicates
recovery of assets and financial trails.
Regional Distribution of Cases
·
1,500 cases under investigation, the
highest among all regions.
·
1,200 cases pending, highlighting
significant benami activities in southern states.
·
900 cases pending, demonstrating
widespread use of benami transactions in the northern belt.
·
800 cases involve substantial assets and
transactions.
· 400 cases pending, marking lower benami activities compared to other regions.Implications and Way Forward
·
Final judgment from the Supreme Court is
critical for resumption of enforcement.
·
The I-T Department’s capacity to act
hinges on legal clarity.
·
Legal complexities due to retrospective
action.
·
Administrative challenges in identifying
and attaching properties.
·
Reinforces the legal foundation of the
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act.
·
Emphasizes the judiciary’s role in
balancing enforcement with constitutional principles.