MANIPUR VIOLENCE – INTERNAL SECURITY

News: Home Minister Amit Shah appeals for 15-day peace in Manipur 

 

What's in the news?

       Union Home Minister Amit Shah met with Kuki civil society groups in Manipur’s Churachandpur district and appealed for 15-day peace in the violence-hit state.

 

Key takeaways:

       Trouble in Manipur began with protests against a High Court order seeking the inclusion of the Meitei community into the State’s Scheduled Tribe list, but soon turned violent with representatives of the Kuki-Zomi community including BJP MLAs seeking a “separate administration”.

       Friction between the Kuki community and the Meiteis over the demand for Scheduled Tribe status for the dominant Meitei community took a violent turn.

       Many tribals, mostly Kukis, were stranded in the Imphal area whereas several Meiteis were stranded in Churachandpur and the Hill districts.

       The Centre is likely to announce a judicial inquiry commission headed by a retired Supreme Court judge to probe the violence in Manipur.

 

Factors leading to Manipur violence:

1. Demand for Scheduled Tribe status:

       The Manipur high court recently asked the state government to send a recommendation to the Centre on the Meiteis demand for Scheduled Tribe status, which has triggered protests by tribal groups fearing a loss of reservation benefits. 

2. Land issues:

       The Meitei community, which is numerically in the majority, mainly inhabits the Imphal Valley, accounting for just a tenth of the state’s total land area. The competition for land and resources has intensified tensions between the Meiteis and hill tribes.  

3. Historic tensions:

       Longstanding tensions between hill tribes and Meiteis in Manipur have contributed to the unrest, as both communities vie for political representation, resources, and cultural recognition. 

4. Governance issues:

       The government’s handling of the situation, such as the suspension of mobile internet and the application of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), has been disruptive and has not effectively addressed the root causes of the unrest. 

5. Lack of economic development:

       Economic underdevelopment in the region has exacerbated inter-ethnic tensions, as communities compete for scarce resources and opportunities.

 

Implications of Manipur violence:

1. Border vulnerability:

       The unrest in Manipur could lead to increased cross-border criminal activities such as smuggling, drug trafficking, and illegal arms trading. This could make the region’s borders more vulnerable and affect overall security. 

2. Growth of militancy:

       Prolonged unrest could provide fertile ground for militant groups to expand their influence and recruit more people, leading to a rise in extremist activities and further destabilizing the region. 

3. Strained relations with neighbouring countries:

       The unrest in Manipur could have implications for India’s relations with neighbouring countries like Myanmar, Bangladesh, and China.

       Increased refugee flows and cross-border crimes can strain relations and hinder diplomatic efforts in the region. 

4. Hindrance to economic development:

       Persistent unrest could deter investment and hinder economic development in the region, leading to increased unemployment and poverty, which in turn could feed into more instability and security challenges. 

5. Challenges to India’s Act East Policy:

       The unrest in Manipur could impact India’s Act East Policy, which aims to boost economic and strategic ties with Southeast Asia.

       Ensuring peace and stability in the Northeast region is essential for the success of this policy and for India’s broader strategic interests. 

6. Internal displacement:

       Unrest in Manipur may lead to the large-scale internal displacement of people, putting pressure on neighbouring states and resources. This could create additional tensions between various ethnic groups and communities, further complicating regional security. 

7. Human rights violations:

       Prolonged unrest may result in human rights violations, attracting international attention and criticism. This could affect India’s image and its ability to advocate for human rights and democratic values in the region and beyond. 

8. Impact on social cohesion:

       The unrest in Manipur can deepen ethnic, religious, and social divisions, weakening social cohesion and harmony. This may lead to long-term challenges for regional security and peacebuilding efforts.