DNA FINGERPRINTING – SCI & TECH

News: Centre to roll out DNA, face matching systems at police stations across India

 

What's in the news?

       More than a year after the Criminal Procedure Identification Act (CrPI) was passed by Parliament, the Centre is all set to roll out ‘DNA and Face Matching’ systems at 1,300 police stations across the country.

 

Key takeaways:

       It will be implemented under the Criminal Procedure Identification Act which was passed in 2022; law enables police and Central investigating agencies to collect, store and analyse physical and biological samples, including retina and iris scan of arrested persons.

 

What is DNA fingerprinting?

       It is a technique for identification of an individual by examining their DNA.

       DNA, or Deoxyribonucleic acid, is the basic building block of life. This component in cells contains all the information about an organism and it also helps transfer the characteristics to the next generation.

       The DNA of each individual is composed of Bases [Adenine (A), Thymine (T), Guanine (G), and Cytosine (C)], Sugar and a Phosphate. Two bases link to each other using hydrogen bonds to form base pairs.

       “Every human has three billion such base pairs. Though 99.7% of the makeup is similar between any two people; there is a 0.3% difference which accounts to almost 10 million different base pairs.

       By examining this we can identify the relation between two people. There is a 50% match between a child and his/her father or mother. Between siblings it can range anywhere between 25% to 75%. Monozygotic twins show a 100% match.

 

Can DNA fingerprinting be done only with blood samples?

       Blood, bones, hair with root, saliva, semen, teeth, and tissue can also be used to study the DNA.

 

How is DNA fingerprinting done?

       The DNA is isolated from the available sample. Each type of sample has a specific protocol for isolation. The DNA fragments are then multiplied using a reaction called Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).

       One small DNA fragment can become a thousand to million copies. This amplified DNA sample then undergoes a technique called gel electrophoresis, which splits it into different visible bands. The band pattern formed by an individual’s DNA is unique. The bands of two or more DNA samples can then be compared using software.

 

Applications:

DNA fingerprinting can be used to resolve disputes of maternity /paternity

  1. - For criminal identification
  2. - To resolve disputes of maternity /paternity
  3. - To identify mutilated remains
  4. - In cases of exchange of babies in hospital wards,
  5. - In forensic wildlife (The arrangement of the nucleotides is unique to any living form (except identical twins) be it animals, plants, or microbes.)

 

Recent Issues regarding DNA Profiling for Criminal Justice system:

       In April 2022, the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act (CrPI) was passed by Parliament.

       The Act enables police and central investigating agencies to collect, store and analyse physical and biological samples including retina and iris scans of arrested persons.

       The rules that would govern the Act were notified in September 2022. However, the Act is yet to be implemented fully as the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), the nodal agency, is still preparing the guidelines and Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to implement the legislation.

       The NCRB operates under the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA).

       Though the Act and rules do not distinctly mention collection of DNA samples and face-matching procedures, in subsequent meetings with State police officials, the NCRB has said that these measures will be rolled out in around 1,300 locations across the country.

 

Why was the legislation brought in?

       The CrPI Act repealed the British-era Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 whose scope was limited to collecting and recording finger impressions, footprint impressions and photographs of certain category of convicted persons and impressions of non-convicted persons on the orders of a Magistrate.

       The government said the new Act made provisions for the use of modern techniques to capture and record appropriate body measurements.

 

What is the role of the NCRB?

       The central body has been entrusted with the task to “store, process, share, disseminate and destroy records of measurements.” Impressions taken at any police station will be stored in a common database maintained by the NCRB. The database could be accessed by authorised police and prison officials across the country.

       The NCRB will prescribe the specifications of the equipments or devices to be used for taking measurements in digital and physical format, the method of handling and storing measurements by the State police in a format compatible with the NCRB database and also the information technology system to be used for taking the measurements.

       Police and prison officials have been authorised to take measurements and the Act expanded the scope to also allow any person skilled in taking the measurements or a registered medical practitioner or any person authorised to take such measurements.

       The records are to be stored for 75 years.

 

What is the status on the ground?

       Police across States have been trained to record finger impressions through the National Automated Fingerprint Identification System (NAFIS).

       However, several police officials said the iris scanners and devices that would enable capturing of DNA and facial-recognition systems are yet to be provided.

       NAFIS, also under the NCRB, is a separate project that was launched in 2022.

       It assigns a unique ten-digit National Fingerprint Number (NFN) to all suspects arrested by the police. State police have their own fingerprint database.

       NAFIS integrates the data on a common platform, enabling the police to run a countrywide search to match fingerprint impressions lifted from a crime scene.

       NAFIS workstations are operational in many States.

 

What are the challenges?

       Issue of Right to Privacy: violated fundamental rights, including the right to privacy. With plans to include DNA samples and facial-recognition technology, questions arose about the protection of such data.

       Lack of awareness among police officials:

       A police officer in Uttar Pradesh said that though the rules state that measurement of persons detained or arrested under prohibitory and preventive sections of law are not to be recorded, not many officers are aware of it.

       The rule states that unless a person is booked under prohibitory and preventive sections that are clubbed with other serious criminal charges, the measurements will not be stored in the system.

       Complexity in case of removal of data if it affects innocent: It takes the onus of destruction and disposal of records of an individual from the central database in case a person has been falsely implicated in a crime or has been acquitted by the court. For such a disposal/destruction, the request will have to be made to the nodal officer.

       Lack of Right to be forgotten:

       The onus for destruction of data in this 75-year time period has also been placed on the people whose data has been collected.

       This would impact people from sections of society who do not have access to the law and would therefore be unable to apply for deletion.

       The provision should be read in terms of the Right to be Forgotten and should not be at the mere discretion of the Nodal Officer.

       The type of DNA samples that could be collected by the police have not been defined yet.

       Lack of Skill and equipment:  

       Handing of DNA samples requires proper training.

       The storage is also a concern.

       Lack of clarity: It is compulsory in offences registered under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. However, what is its scope in other crimes such as cheating and snatching is yet to be spelt out clearly.

       Chances of misuse: In meetings with the States, the NCRB has cautioned against the misuse of the database by ensuring identification and deployment of appropriate safeguards allowing only designated officials to access the data in real time.

       Lack of Infrastructure: connectivity is a huge problem and police in smaller States have been unable to fulfil the requirement of secured Internet lease lines.