Directorate of Revenue
Intelligence (DRI) - POLITY
NEWS: 67th Foundation Day of the Directorate of Revenue
Intelligence.
WHAT’S IN THE
NEWS?
Establishment
and Evolution
- The Directorate of
Revenue Intelligence (DRI), India’s leading agency for combating
economic crimes, was formally established in 1957.
- However, its origins
date back to 1953, when the Central Revenue Intelligence Board
was set up to enhance India’s revenue intelligence framework.
- Initially, DRI focused
on preventing smuggling of contraband items, particularly gold,
narcotics, and other prohibited goods. Over time, its
mandate has expanded significantly.
Shifts in
Administrative Control
- From its inception, DRI
operated under the Department of Revenue (DoR) until June 1970,
when it was moved temporarily to the Ministry of Home Affairs and
later to the Cabinet Secretariat.
- In 1977, it was
brought back under the Ministry of Finance (DoR), where it
continues to operate, reinforcing its critical role in protecting the
nation’s economic interests.
Expanded
Mandate and Creation of Sister Agencies
Expanding
Jurisdiction
- Over the decades, DRI
has evolved to address a broader array of economic offences,
including:
- Commercial fraud
- Money laundering
- Trafficking in counterfeit currencies
- Illegal trade in wildlife and timber
Creation of
Specialized Agencies from DRI
- Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI):
Initially known as the Directorate General of Anti-Evasion and
later as the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence,
this agency was carved out to specialize in detecting and investigating GST-related
frauds.
- Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB):
Before becoming an independent entity, the NCB’s anti-narcotics operations
were part of DRI’s functions. It now focuses exclusively on combating drug
trafficking.
International
Operations and Collaborations
- DRI actively
participates in several cross-border operations to combat:
- Trafficking in small arms and light weapons
- Money laundering linked to terrorist financing
- Illegal wildlife and timber trade
- DRI’s Annual
Regional Customs Enforcement Meeting, held since 2013 alongside
its Foundation Day celebrations, has become a pivotal platform for
collaboration between:
- Customs enforcement heads from neighboring
countries
- Global organizations, including the World
Customs Organization (WCO), Interpol, and the United
Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)
DRI’s
Achievements in 2023-24
Record
Seizures and Financial Recoveries
- In the financial year 2023-24,
DRI made significant strides, seizing contraband worth ₹3,573 crore.
- The agency also
uncovered Customs duty evasion amounting to approximately ₹6,000
crore, highlighting its efficiency in detecting and preventing
large-scale revenue fraud.
Role as a
Sentinel Against Global Economic Crime
- DRI’s operations have
successfully disrupted sophisticated smuggling networks and economic
fraud schemes.
- The agency’s
collaboration with national and international counterparts
enhances its ability to counter threats that transcend geographical
boundaries.
Legal
Challenges: The Canon Judgment and Its Ramifications
Canon
Judgment (March 2021)
- In Canon India vs
Commissioner of Customs, the Supreme Court ruled that the term
“the proper officer” under Section 28 of the Customs Act
refers solely to the officer who assessed the bill of entry under Section
17.
- This interpretation
effectively barred DRI officers from issuing show-cause notices
under Section 28, creating a significant operational roadblock.
- Financial Impact:
The judgment put approximately ₹25,000 crore of potential revenue
recovery at risk, threatening the exchequer’s fiscal stability.
Government’s
Response
- To address this, the
government:
- Filed a review
petition challenging the Supreme Court’s interpretation.
- Introduced amendments
through the Finance Act, 2022, to validate past actions by DRI and
redefine its powers regarding the issuance of show-cause notices.
Legal
Redemption: Supreme Court Ruling in November 2024
Consolidated
Review
- In November 2024,
the Supreme Court delivered a consolidated ruling on several related
cases, including:
- Mangali Impex
- Sunil Gupta
- Daikin Airconditioning India
- This judgment provided
much-needed clarity on DRI’s jurisdiction and authority.
Key Outcomes
of the Judgment
- The Court upheld DRI’s
jurisdiction to issue show-cause notices under Section 28 of
the Customs Act.
- Validated the
retrospective amendments made under the Finance Act, 2022.
- Clarified the distinct
functions of Sections 17 (assessment) and 28 (duty
recovery), affirming that these provisions operate independently of one
another.
Broader Legal
Implications
- The judgment reaffirmed
the legislature’s authority to rectify jurisdictional gaps
retrospectively.
- Emphasized that legal
disputes should focus on the substantive merits of a case rather
than relying solely on jurisdictional technicalities.
Future
Challenges and Strategic Priorities
Emerging
Threats in Economic Crime
- Sophistication of Criminal Networks:
Smuggling and economic crime networks are employing increasingly complex
methods, including:
- Layered trade routes
- Use of digital currencies and blockchain
technology for illicit financial transactions.
- DRI must continuously
adapt its operational strategies to counter these evolving threats.
Investment in
Technology and Intelligence
- Leveraging advanced
intelligence-gathering tools and adopting cutting-edge data
analytics technologies will be crucial in enhancing DRI’s operational
effectiveness.
- Investments in AI-powered
monitoring systems could help track and predict smuggling activities
in real-time.
Strengthening
International Cooperation
- Collaborations with global
enforcement agencies will remain critical in countering transnational
crimes.
- DRI’s leadership in regional
forums like the Annual Customs Enforcement Meeting ensures it
remains at the forefront of global efforts against economic crimes.
Conclusion
The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence has consistently played a crucial
role in safeguarding India’s economic sovereignty. Despite facing
significant legal challenges, such as the Canon judgment, DRI has
emerged stronger, backed by judicial validation and legislative
support. Moving forward, the agency must adopt adaptive strategies,
enhance its technological capabilities, and foster global
partnerships to effectively combat the ever-evolving landscape of economic
crimes and illicit trade.
Source: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2080783