ASEAN-India Free
Trade Agreement - ECONOMY
NEWS: After 15 years, it
is time to review the achievements, prospects and the way
Forward for the ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement
(AIFTA).
WHAT’S IN THE NEWS?
ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA):
An Overview
- Operationalization:
AIFTA was launched in 2010 to expand and diversify trade between India and
ASEAN in goods and services.
- Initial
Assumptions: Leveraging cost advantages and duty
preferences was expected to benefit both partners.
- Need
for Review: After 15 years, issues such as trade
imbalances, structural challenges, and market access disparities
necessitate a review.
Key Issues with AIFTA
1. Misguided Assumptions
- Higher
Duty Preferences by India: India offered
greater tariff concessions to ASEAN, granting disproportionate market
access.
- Accelerated
Tariff Elimination: India committed to a faster
reduction of tariffs than ASEAN nations, favoring ASEAN exporters.
- Compartmentalized
Timelines: Extended tariff elimination periods
for Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam (CLMV), particularly Vietnam,
allowed them to capitalize on India's market.
2. Structural Disadvantages
- Manufacturing
Networks: ASEAN's integrated manufacturing
ecosystem provided economies of scale, disadvantaging India.
- Barriers
for Indian Firms: Indian companies faced
challenges accessing ASEAN markets in sectors like two-wheelers, pushing
them to establish ASEAN-based operations.
3. Regional Comprehensive Economic
Partnership (RCEP) Impact
- Strengthened
ASEAN-China Ties: RCEP deepened ASEAN-China
manufacturing linkages, increasing ASEAN competitiveness.
- Circumvention
Practices: Lenient Rules of Origin (ROO) under
AIFTA facilitated the routing of Chinese goods (e.g., steel) through
ASEAN, harming Indian industries.
4. Sectoral Challenges
- Trade
Deficit: India became a net importer of key
products like iron, steel, and electronics.
- Gold
Import Exploitation: ASEAN leveraged AIFTA to import
raw gold, convert it to finished products, and export to India under
preferential tariffs, circumventing duties.
Challenges in Current Framework
1. Imbalanced Market Access
- Limited
Reciprocity: Indian exports face barriers, while
ASEAN enjoys easy access to Indian markets.
- Selective
ASEAN Support: Sectors like electronics and
metallurgy deepen trade imbalances.
2. Circumvention Practices
- Rules
of Origin Exploitation: Non-ASEAN goods are
rerouted through ASEAN nations, worsening India's trade deficit.
- Eroded
Competitiveness: Domestic industries, especially
steel, face severe setbacks.
Recommendations and Way Forward
1. Strategic Negotiations
- Game
Theory Application: Use frameworks like Nash
Equilibrium to achieve balanced trade terms, avoiding non-tariff barriers
and ROO exploitation.
- Focus
on Indian Exports: Prioritize market access for
pharmaceuticals, IT, textiles, automobiles, and food products to reduce
trade disparities.
2. Strengthen Domestic Industries
- Make-in-India
Initiative: Enhance production capacities in
base metals, defence, electronics, and emerging technologies.
- Friendly
Investment Climate: Establish Special Economic
Zones (SEZs) and tax-free financial centres to attract investment and
reduce bureaucratic hurdles.
3. Revisiting FTA Terms
- Stricter
Rules of Origin: Ensure ASEAN-origin goods adhere to
genuine criteria to prevent circumvention.
- Reciprocal
Market Access: Demand fairer terms for Indian
products in ASEAN markets.
Conclusion
- AIFTA
has facilitated trade but also exposed structural and procedural flaws,
leading to imbalances.
- Recalibrating
terms, fostering domestic manufacturing, and addressing systemic
disparities can create a balanced and mutually beneficial trade
partnership.