Live Updates
UPSC · English

Supreme Court Restricts Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances

Published 30 Jul 2026. Access the PDF directly or read the stored explanation below.

UPSC English 30 Jul 2026

Supreme Court Restricts Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances

Prelims:

Environment & Ecology

Mains:

GS Paper II-Judiciary, GS Paper III-Environment Conservation

Current relevance:

The Supreme Court quashed, the 2021 Office Memorandum (OM) prospectively, holding that it created a permanent mechanism for granting ex post facto environmental clearances to projects that had commenced without prior Environmental Clearance (EC).

 


At a glance:

Judicial Background:

1.        A Division Bench (May 2025) declared retrospective environmental clearances a gross illegality.

2.      In November 2025, a larger Bench diluted the ruling, observing that abolishing the retrospective clearance regime could have a devastating effect on ongoing public projects worth thousands of crores of rupees.

3.      Administrative Orders Cannot Override Law

            i.            The Supreme Court held that the 2021 Office Memorandum, being an administrative order, could not modify the environmental clearance framework established under the 2006 Notification.

          ii.            It ruled that delegated legislation cannot be replaced or modified through administrative instructions.

        iii.            The Court observed that an amnesty measure cannot become a permanent parallel mechanism to bypass the mandatory prior environmental clearance process. 

Prior Environmental Clearance Regime:

         i.          The Court reaffirmed that prior Environmental Clearance (EC) under the 2006 Notification is mandatory for sectors including highways, airports, real estate and township development, mining and resource extraction.

       ii.            Any relaxation to the prior EC regime can be introduced only through an appropriate amnesty notification for select deserving projects involving supervening public interest, and not through administrative orders.

Court's Observations:

         i.            The Court observed that the 2021 OM indiscriminately regularised projects for a meagre compensation, promoting a "pollute and then pay" approach instead of sustainable development.

       ii.            The Centre has been barred from issuing administrative orders to grant ex post facto environmental clearances in the future.

     iii.            Legal framework:

The judgment clarified that the Supreme Court retains its power under Article 142 to grant ex post facto environmental clearances in appropriate cases. 

Source: THE HINDU- https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-middle-path-explaining-supreme-courts-latest-verdict-on-post-facto-environmental-clearances/article71284888.ece

Back to All Titbits
WhatsApp Book Free Demo