OECD'S GLOBAL TAX DEAL - ECONOMY

OECD's global tax deal - ECONOMY

NEWS: India is considering whether it should continue its participation in the OECD's global tax deal following the United States' decision to withdraw from the pact.

 

WHAT’S IN THE NEWS?

US’s exit effectively nullified the progress made by the OECD in bringing together 140 countries to agree on a global minimum tax of 15% for profits made by multinational corporations.

 

What is Global Minimum Tax?

  • A Global Minimum Tax (GMT) applies a standard minimum tax rate to a defined corporate income base worldwide.
  • The OECD developed a proposal featuring a corporate minimum tax of 15% on foreign profits of large multinationals, which would give countries new annual tax revenues of USD 150 billion.
  • The framework of GMT aims to discourage nations from tax competition through lower tax rates that result in corporate profit shifting and tax base erosion.

 

What are the Key Points of the Plan?

  • Two Pillar Plan:
    • Pillar 1:
      • 25% of profits of the largest and most profitable Multinational Enterprise (MNEs) above a set profit margin would be reallocated to the market jurisdictions where the MNE’s users and customers are located.
      • It also provides for a simplified and streamlined approach to the application of the arm’s length principle to in-country baseline marketing and distribution activities.
      • It includes features to ensure dispute prevention and dispute resolution in order to address any risk of double taxation, but with an elective mechanism for some low-capacity countries.
      • It also entails the removal and standstill of Digital Services Taxes (DST) and similar relevant measures, to prevent harmful trade disputes.
    • Pillar 2:
      • It provides a minimum 15% tax on corporate profit, putting a floor on tax competition.
      • This will apply to multinational groups with annual global revenues of over 750 million euros. Governments across the world will impose additional taxes on the foreign profits of MNEs headquartered in their jurisdiction at least to the agreed minimum rate.
        • This means that if a company’s earnings go untaxed or lightly taxed in one of the tax havens, their home country would impose a top-up tax that would bring the effective rate to 15%.
  • Objectives:
    • It aims to ensure that big businesses with global operations do not benefit by domiciling themselves in tax havens in order to save on taxes.
    • The minimum tax and other provisions aim to put an end to decades of tax competition between governments to attract foreign investment.

 

What is the Significance of the Move?

  • End of Race to the Bottom:

·         It tries to put an end to the “race to the bottom” which has made it harder for governments to shore up the revenues required to fund their rising spending budgets.

    • A race to the bottom refers to heightened competition between nations, states, or companies, where product quality or rational economic decisions are sacrificed in order to gain a competitive advantage or reduction in product manufacturing costs.
  • Stopping Financial Diversion to Tax Havens:

·         Increasingly, income from intangible sources such as drug patents, software and royalties on intellectual property has migrated to Tax Havens, allowing companies to avoid paying higher taxes in their traditional home countries.

  • Mobilising Financial Resources:

·         With budgets strained after the Covid-19 crisis, many governments want more than ever to discourage multinationals from shifting profits – and tax revenues – to low-tax countries regardless of where their sales are made.

  • Global Tax Reforms: Since the inception of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) programme, the proposal for GMT is another positive step towards global taxation reforms.

·         BEPS refers to tax avoidance strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules to artificially shift profits to low or no-tax locations. OECD has issued 15 Action Items to address this.

  • Counters Global Inequality:

·         The minimum tax proposal is particularly relevant at a time when the fiscal state of governments across the world has deteriorated as seen in the worsening of public debt metrics.

  • It is believed that the plan will also help counter rising global inequality by making it tougher for large businesses to pay low taxes by availing the services of tax havens.

 

What are the Issues?

  • Threat of tax Competition:

·         It is considered the threat of tax competition that keeps a check on governments which would otherwise tax their citizens heavily to fund profligate spending programs.

  • Impending Sovereignty:

·         It impinges on the right of the sovereign to decide a nation’s tax policy.

·         A global minimum rate would essentially take away a tool country use to push policies that suit them.

  • Question of Efficacy:

·         The deal has also been criticized for lacking teeth: Groups such as Oxfam said the deal would not put an end to tax havens.

 

Implications of the U.S. Pulling Out of the OECD Tax Deal

1. Uncertainty in Global Tax Coordination

  • The United States has historically played a key role in shaping international economic agreements.
  • If the U.S. withdraws from the OECD tax deal, it could create uncertainty in global tax coordination and weaken the effectiveness of the agreement.
  • Without U.S. participation, other countries may be less motivated to implement the tax reforms, potentially leading to a fragmented global tax system where different nations impose their own tax rules.

2. Impact on U.S. Multinational Corporations

  • Major U.S.-based tech giants such as Google, Amazon, Apple, and Facebook have long sought to reduce their global tax burden by shifting profits to countries with low or zero corporate tax rates.
  • If the U.S. withdraws from the OECD deal, these companies may not be subject to additional tax liabilities in foreign countries under the Pillar 1 framework.
  • Furthermore, they may avoid the 15% global minimum tax under Pillar 2, allowing them to continue benefiting from existing tax structures and reducing their overall tax obligations.
  • This could create tensions between the U.S. and other countries that have been advocating for higher corporate taxes on digital services.

3. Consequences for India and Other Emerging Economies

  • India, like many other developing nations, has been pushing for fair taxation of digital services offered by multinational companies.
  • The U.S. withdrawal from the deal could make it more difficult for India to impose top-up taxes on U.S.-based multinational corporations operating within its borders.
  • Additionally, India has introduced a 2% equalization levy on foreign technology firms that generate revenue from Indian consumers but do not have a significant physical presence in the country.
  • However, if other nations align their tax policies with the OECD framework, India may face pressure to modify or remove the equalization levy, potentially affecting its ability to collect tax revenue from foreign tech giants.

 

Source: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/foreign-trade/india-to-evaluate-benefits-of-oecds-global-tax-deal-post-us-walkout-finance-secretary/articleshow/117910919.cms?from=mdr